Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
Date: 2022-09-29 06:28:57
Message-ID: f8808482-8de1-e63e-afef-eb5fd2c13328@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/29/22 8:12 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:58:48PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> I had a look at v5 and it does look good to me.
>
> Okay, cool. I have spent some time today doing a last pass over it
> and an extra round of tests. Things looked fine, so applied.
> --

Thanks for your precious help!

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com 2022-09-29 06:29:58 Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-09-29 06:18:48 Re: Extend win32 error codes to errno mapping in win32error.c