Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
Date: 2022-09-29 06:12:20
Message-ID: YzU3RJZQstN0PEkq@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:58:48PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> I had a look at v5 and it does look good to me.

Okay, cool. I have spent some time today doing a last pass over it
and an extra round of tests. Things looked fine, so applied.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-09-29 06:18:48 Re: Extend win32 error codes to errno mapping in win32error.c
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2022-09-29 06:11:30 Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache