Re: A problem in inheritance

From: "Talha Khan" <talha(dot)amjad(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A problem in inheritance
Date: 2007-06-25 20:48:01
Message-ID: f80885fc0706251348r7f775750y530aefb3e3eb03f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>to impact that update you'd have to have a rule on
>>account_login. No rule on a child table will matter.

Well i had the same perception.... In order to double check this i created
an On insert do nothing rule on the child table and did an insertion to the
master table i.e (account_login) but this time the On insert do nothing rule
did affect and no insert was done to the child table...

Note: I did not have any on insert do nothing rule on the master table.

Regards,

Talha Amjad

On 6/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Talha Khan wrote:
> > THE ACTUAL TEST:
> >
> > DROP RULE account_login_no_update ON account_login;
> >
> >
> > UPDATE account_login set originating_source = 'xxx';
> >
> > Now the update should not effect the child table but it does,
> > evident
> > from the output of the following query:
>
> That's because you dropped the rule that would have affected that
> query. Remember that rules effectively work on the query strings
> themselves, so to impact that update you'd have to have a rule on
> account_login. No rule on a child table will matter.
> --
> Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2007-06-25 21:00:36 Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-25 20:40:43 Re: Standby servers and incrementally updated backups