Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS

From: "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Brent Wilkins" <wilkins(at)cs(dot)colostate(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS
Date: 2006-06-29 18:34:04
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70606291134w407d957mc3f3874985b7b66a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

+1

What about something like (see below) to get a first snapshot:

http://statcvs.sourceforge.net/

g.-

On 6/29/06, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > I wonder if that number would need to be bumped up in a rather handwavy
> > manner (amybe +50) on the grounds of companies like enterprisedb,
> > fujitsu, greenplum, and sun, which I would guess have developers working
> > behind the scenes on issues thier companies care most about, which then
> > get filtered up through a few individuals to the community at large.
> > Additionally we also have more "closely tied" projects like slony and
> > npgsql to draw in more people. Thoughts?
>
> No, I think if we change the numbers, we need to do a full re-count.
>
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Barosio 2006-06-29 18:37:23 who keeps this?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-06-29 18:24:23 Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS