Re: how to recall the initial definition (CREATE TABLE) of a table ?

Without aim of further discussions, this kind of situations are silly.
Best solution, get out of the list if you feel enough tough to read and
support certain
discussions.

Anyway, I feel that we can be more "helpfull" providing non agressive posts,
which unfortunatelly
I notice increasing.

Keep the order !

Best wishes,
Guido

On 1/9/06, Amit_Wadhwa(at)dell(dot)com <Amit_Wadhwa(at)dell(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So much for giving a valid answer.
>
> 1. Do you want to even try using PGAdmin?
> BTW.. *(THAT MEANS "BY THE WAY")* It's a postgreSQL admin tool which
> is freely available on the web.
> If you want people to post you a full-length solution on the list I
> don't think that's what a list is for. I think you need to do some research
> after picking up tips from users on this list.
>
> 2. Break the thread? What do you mean by references header? I left your
> subject intact, isnt that enough reference?
>
> 3. Id rather say your question was silly. Being too lazy to open your SQL
> books *IS SILLY*.
> Being too lazy to put in some of your own effort and do some research
> after someone gives you an answer *IS SILLY.*
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Kretschmer [mailto:andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com<andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
> ]
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:55 PM
> To: Wadhwa, Amit
> Subject: Re: [NOVICE] how to recall the initial definition (CREATE TABLE)
> of a table ?
>
> am 09.01.2006, um 7:58:54 -0600 mailte Amit_Wadhwa(at)Dell(dot)com folgendes:
> > Why don't you use PGAdmin ?
>
> 1. This isn't a meaningful answer, because, for instance, i havn't
> installed this
> 2. why do you break the thread? in your mail there are no
> references-header
> 3. top-posting with fulltext quoting below are silly
>
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Kretschmer (Kontakt: siehe Header)
> Heynitz: 035242/47212, D1: 0160/7141639
> GnuPG-ID 0x3FFF606C http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
> === Schollglas Unternehmensgruppe ===
>
>

--
"Adopting the position that you are smarter than an automaticoptimization
algorithm is generally a good way to achieve lessperformance, not more" -
Tom Lane.