|From:||Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||"Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: speeding up planning with partitions|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Thanks for looking.
On 2018/11/07 12:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> ISTM patch 0004 is impossible to review just because of size -- I
> suppose the bulk of it is just code that moves from one file to another,
> but that there are also code changes in it. Maybe it would be better to
> split it so that one patch moves the code to the new files without
> changing it, then another patch does the actual functional changes? If
> git shows the first half as a rename, it's easier to be confident about
Okay, will post a new version structured that way shortly.
|Next Message||Jonathan S. Katz||2018-11-07 04:08:39||Re: First-draft release notes for back-branch releases|
|Previous Message||Etsuro Fujita||2018-11-07 03:44:33||Re: BUG #15449: file_fdw using program cause exit code error when using LIMIT|