Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2
Date: 2019-02-18 23:17:55
Message-ID: f739af83-9a78-b300-3a11-21c4d6524d66@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2/18/19 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2019-02-18 12:37:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Can't you do it now? The status summary line already shows one
>>> patch as having been pushed to the next CF.
>> It's CF app nannyism. One can't move a patch to the next CF that's
>> waiting-on-author. I've complained about that a number of times, but...
> So change it to another state, push it, change it again.
>
>

I'm with Andres. I found this annoying six months ago.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-02-18 23:23:16 Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-18 23:15:00 Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE