Re: PDF build warnings

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PDF build warnings
Date: 2018-06-27 06:27:27
Message-ID: f6c8315a-190a-41d3-e696-470d82f66fb3@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hello,
27.06.2018 02:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> When doing a test run of the PDF docs for beta2 on borka, I noticed that the
>> build finishes with this -- is it expected?
>> [ lots of "Unresolved ID reference" ]
> Yeah, we've pretty much always had that. It used to be spelled
> differently with the old toolchain, but I think mostly the same
> tags were complained of. Don't know the cause.
This was discussed some time ago:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/45f75674-221b-1ec4-69ca-f9c00bd4bff6@2ndquadrant.com

As I remember such id don't get into internal FOP id table and then when
rechecking id's it can't be resolved.
Still think that it should be fixed just to bring attention to another
(may be more important) warnings.
I can prepare a patch if you find it useful.

Best regards,
------
Alexander Lakhin
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2018-06-27 10:01:03 Re: Некорректное пояснение к примеру в разделе 13.2.1
Previous Message Алексей Снытко 2018-06-27 05:05:17 Некорректное пояснение к примеру в разделе 13.2.1