Re: drop postmaster symlink

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: drop postmaster symlink
Date: 2023-01-25 13:00:03
Message-ID: f6c7bdd1102e9f8b1013a2d4a4552759a695b900.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 08:54 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Apart from your concerns, it appears there is consensus for making
> this change.  The RPM packaging scripts can obviously be fixed
> easily for this.  Do you have an objection to making this change?

I'm inclined to create the symlink in the RPMs to make users' lives
(and my life) easier. So, no objection from here.

Regards,

--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2023-01-25 13:02:11 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Previous Message Nitin Jadhav 2023-01-25 12:16:56 Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function