Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-24 15:49:18
Message-ID: f6c53383-e2ed-4b7f-aada-ef0dfbdbc37b@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Just to be clear: I'm not fond of encoding the answer to the universe
> into statement name.
> However, I find that "name convention" a smart invention.

I forgot one more decision: add GUC variable.
A little fatty for this but not touch the protocol and easy to implement.

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-24 15:51:25 Re: Rationalizing code-sharing among src/bin/ directories
Previous Message Christian Ullrich 2016-03-24 15:44:37 Re: BUG #13854: SSPI authentication failure: wrong realm name used