Re: AIX support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Srirama Kucherlapati <sriram(dot)rk(at)in(dot)ibm(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, AIX PG user <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Subject: Re: AIX support
Date: 2026-01-26 12:22:04
Message-ID: f6c4e700-73b9-47e7-bf0b-ccb2b7020739@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23.01.26 17:11, Srirama Kucherlapati wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> > It's ok to split changes into multiple patches, and then recommend
> which parts you want
>> reviewed first. But we need to see at least a rough outline of the
> > complete plan before spending significant effort on reviewing the pieces.
> Please find attached patches.
>     Meson changes    - 0001-Support-for-AIX-pg19-meson.2.diff
>     Complete changes - 0001-Support-for-AIX.pg19.v11.patch
>
> We have updated couple of changes in the full patch wrt to your previous
> comments as well. Also, we are working to get the stats for the s_lock.h wrt
> TAS. Will submit in a different thread.

Ok, that patch set looks pretty reasonable now.

Can you confirm that this is the complete patch set required for AIX
support?

What version of AIX are you testing with?

What compilers are you testing with?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-01-26 12:33:02 Re: Is abort() still needed in WalSndShutdown()?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-01-26 12:17:15 rename and move AssertVariableIsOfType