| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com" <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |
| Date: | 2021-07-19 11:13:57 |
| Message-ID: | f6a06ecdf378b50ed871e363aa9ac7e706101ab6.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 16:46 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > In your opinion, would the current one-line patch proposal make things
> > strictly better than they are today, or would it have mixed results?
> > I'm wondering how to help this patch move forward for the current
> > commitfest, or if we should maybe return with feedback for now.
>
> Based on the following list, it seems to me that [u+1f300,u+0x1faff]
> won't capture everything, like the country flags:
> http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html
That could be adapted; the question is if the approach as such is
desirable or not. This is necessarily a moving target, at the rate
that emojis are created and added to Unicode.
My personal feeling is that something simple and perhaps imperfect
as my one-liner that may miss some corner cases would be ok, but
anything that saps more performance or is complicated would not
be worth the effort.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-07-19 11:30:00 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
| Previous Message | tushar | 2021-07-19 11:04:27 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |