Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes
Date: 2018-04-23 12:57:34
Message-ID: f5e26da2-1917-ed51-3ac9-8f1a12d9501e@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you, pushed

> I see your point. Maybe don't have the newline between the get and
> set, though, to match the existing style. And, the note about the
> assertion seems unnecessary.
Removed newline and note

> "Get/set leaf page highkey's link. During the second phase of
> deletion, the target leaf page's high key may point to an ancestor
> page (at all other times, the leaf level high key's link is not used).
> See the nbtree README for full details."
Changed as you suggested.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-04-23 13:15:47 Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-04-23 11:25:09 Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows