| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: anonymous unions (C11) |
| Date: | 2026-01-21 11:21:55 |
| Message-ID: | f5e05c40-2737-4fc1-9b96-a81bd2422658@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19.01.26 22:10, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Sep-23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Here is another patch set to sprinkle some C11 features around the
>> code. My aim is to make a little bit of use of several C11 features
>> as examples and encouragement for future code, and to test compilers
>> (although we're not yet at the point where this should really stress
>> any compiler).
>
> I was going over patch [1] today and came across the union in
> relopt_value. Vaguely remembering this thread, I patched it out
> (attached) ... and now that I come here to post it, I realize that it's
> probably identical to your patch 0009 here.
>
> Would you push it or can I?
Go ahead please.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-01-21 11:27:29 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-01-21 11:13:02 | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations |