Re: Partial aggregates pushdown

From: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ilya Gladyshev <i(dot)gladyshev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: 2022-11-30 14:30:45
Message-ID: f5d2e17a481d80e61c0ae1fce436ef99@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp писал 2022-11-30 13:01:

>> 2) Do we really have to look at pg_proc in partial_agg_ok() and
>> deparseAggref()? Perhaps, looking at aggtranstype is enough?
> You are right. I fixed according to your comment.
>

partial_agg_ok() still looks at pg_proc.

--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2022-11-30 15:01:36 Re: pgsql: Revoke PUBLIC CREATE from public schema, now owned by pg_databas
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-11-30 14:10:35 Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes