Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Date: 2016-06-09 09:50:02
Message-ID: f596d9b8-2b82-fa99-3472-582fd5d50a12@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/06/08 23:16, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>>> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>>>
>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert,
>>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>>> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
>>> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
>>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>>> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
>>> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>>
>> Discussion of this issue is still ongoing. Accordingly, I intend to
>> wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further.
>> I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update
>> by then.
>
> Ashutosh seemed OK with the latest patch.

I adjusted some comments per off-list suggestion from Ashutosh. Please
find attached the new version.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgfdw-join-pd-bug-4.patch text/x-diff 4.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-09 12:33:52 Re: LSN as a recovery target
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-06-09 09:48:40 Re: Reviewing freeze map code