Re: assorted code cleanup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: assorted code cleanup
Date: 2017-09-05 19:12:41
Message-ID: f52c16db-14ed-757d-4b48-7ef360b1631d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/21/17 01:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - Drop excessive dereferencing of function pointers
>
> - (*next_ProcessUtility_hook) (pstmt, queryString,
> + next_ProcessUtility_hook(pstmt, queryString,
> context, params, queryEnv,
> dest, completionTag);
> But this... Personally I like the current grammar which allows one to
> make the difference between a function call with something declared
> locally and something that may be going to a custom code path. So I
> think that you had better not update the system hooks that external
> modules can use via shared_preload_libraries.

Do you mean specifically the hook variables, or any function pointers?
I can see your point in the above case, but for example here

- if ((*tinfo->f_lt) (o.upper, c.upper, flinfo))
+ if (tinfo->f_lt(o.upper, c.upper, flinfo))

I think there is no loss of clarity and the extra punctuation makes it
more complicated to read.

>> - Remove unnecessary parentheses in return statements
>
> So you would still keep parenthesis like here for simple expressions:
> contrib/bloom/blutils.c: return (x - 1);
> No objections.
>
> Here are some more:
> contrib/intarray/_int_bool.c: return (calcnot) ?
> contrib/ltree/ltxtquery_op.c: return (calcnot) ?
>
> And there are many "(0)" "S_ANYTHING" in src/interfaces/ecpg/test/ and
> src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/.

Thanks, I included these.

>> - Remove our own definition of NULL
>
> Fine. c.h uses once NULL before enforcing its definition.

Actually, that would have worked fine, because the earlier use is a
macro definition, so NULL would not have been needed until it is used.

>> - fuzzystrmatch: Remove dead code
>
> Those are remnants of a323ede, which missed to removed everything.

Good reference, makes sense.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-05 19:32:27 Re: assorted code cleanup
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-05 19:08:50 Re: assorted code cleanup