| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
| Date: | 2025-06-12 14:25:22 |
| Message-ID: | f4ff9294-b491-4053-83f5-11c10ab8c999@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.02.25 19:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I suggest the attached, which gets 99% there with 10% of the
> complexity, and has \conninfo (no plus sign) output this:
>
> Connection Information
> Parámetro │ Valor
> ───────────────────────┼────────────────────────
> Base de Datos │ alvherre
> Client User │ alvherre
> Host │ 192.168.178.37
> Port │ 55432
> Opciones │
> Protocol Version │ 3
> Password Used? │ false
> GSSAPI Authenticated? │ false
> Backend PID │ 1589499
> TLS Connection? │ true
> TLS Library │ OpenSSL
> TLS Protocol │ TLSv1.3
> TLS Key Bits │ 256
> TLS Cipher │ TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
> TLS Compression │ false
> ALPN │ postgresql
> Superuser? │ on
> Hot standby? │ off
> (18 filas)
This new code uses the term "TLS" where the rest of PostgreSQL,
including the rest of psql, uses the term "SSL". Making this different
seems uselessly confusing. I suggest the attached patch to use "SSL"
here as well.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-psql-Change-new-conninfo-to-use-SSL-instead-of-TLS.patch | text/plain | 3.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrice Chapuis | 2025-06-12 14:27:58 | Re: failover logical replication slots |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2025-06-12 14:22:22 | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |