From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add blog RSS feed |
Date: | 2024-12-06 01:23:03 |
Message-ID: | f4fd63a5-4009-4ebb-a9b5-a5ad68c465c2@aklaver.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 12/5/24 16:50, James Sewell wrote:
> This is interesting! You're right, that feed will not always meet those
> requirements because it could have non-Postgres related content from me.
>
> Let me have a think about how we can address this.
From what I remember when I signed up there is the ability to only
include blog posts that have specific tag, in my case that is Postgres.
>
> - J
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 1:24 AM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org
> <mailto:dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 at 03:09, Jeremy Schneider
> <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com <mailto:schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Anyone here know who's taking care of Planet Postgres these days?
>
> I was chatting w James Sewell on slack and he mentioned that
> he's got a blog sitting unapproved in the queue for a few weeks
> now and hasn't heard anything back. I thought when I submitted
> my blog to planet it got approved really fast, so I wonder if
> his email hit someone's spam folder or someone's on vacation or
> something like that?
>
>
> Sorry about that - there was some discussion on whether all the
> posts on the feed were appropriate or not, and it got forgotten
> whilst we were waiting for some more content to review. It's
> approved now.
>
> As a general note to all our bloggers, please filter feeds to ensure
> that all posts meet the requirements of the policy at
> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/planet-postgresql/
> <https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/planet-postgresql/>. The
> most common reason we get complaints or that we do not approve feeds
> (by far) is that they fail the "ad test". In short, if a blog
> discusses something other than PostgreSQL (and that something is not
> both related to PostgreSQL and released under an OSI approved
> licence), if all mentions of the something are removed, is the post
> still useful? If not, it will fail the ad test.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org <https://www.pgadmin.org>
> PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org <https://www.postgresql.org>
> pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com <https://www.pgedge.com>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2024-12-06 04:24:28 | Re: Add blog RSS feed |
Previous Message | James Sewell | 2024-12-06 00:50:59 | Re: Add blog RSS feed |