Re: Why doesn't the "extras" repo have all HAProxy 3.2.x patch versions?

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Greg Clough <greg(at)gclough(dot)com>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why doesn't the "extras" repo have all HAProxy 3.2.x patch versions?
Date: 2026-04-30 14:25:43
Message-ID: f4120e920264f7e96e892c2d0bdfe54267fdb828.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

Hi Greg,

On Wed, 2026-04-29 at 13:22 +0100, Greg Clough wrote:
> The "extras" repo has HAProxy 3.2.0 -> 3.2.8 available:
>
> https://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/extras/redhat/rhel-9-x86_64/
>
> Checking on HAProxy, there are newer patch versions 3.2.9 -> 3.2.16
> which are not in PGDG:
>
> https://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-3.2.8.html
>
> Is there a reason for this?  I'd prefer to stay on 3.2.x as it's LTS,
> whereas 3.3.x will only exist for 1 year and then be unmaintained.

I'm not very familiar to HAProxy release policy, so followed the regular
"rolling release" thing. OTOH we have one spec file currently so cannot
maintain both without some manual modifications.

Feel free to submit a patch if you think it is worth maintaining 3.2.X,
and its spec file should be in a different directory (haproxy32?) than
the current one.

Cheers,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2026-05-07 10:40:20 RHEL 10.2 beta and 9.8 beta RPMS are available
Previous Message Greg Clough 2026-04-29 12:22:50 Why doesn't the "extras" repo have all HAProxy 3.2.x patch versions?