Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-15 16:45:23
Message-ID: f3cfdea2edc3f8b5147d6cc0bdcbd7a9@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> This patch has annoyed me twice in two days now, and similarly with
> other people I know. Having to type \dfS now is about the worst loss of
> usability in psql that I can recall. Can we reconsider or revert this?

The problem is that you, me, and the people we know are the only ones
who actually use \df to see system functions. 99.99% of users don't care,
or don't even know, about the system functions - but they do care about
being able to view /their/ functions. So from a usability perspective,
asking a small minority of users to learn to type an extra character is
a small price to pay for a great leap in usability for everyone else.

Frankly, the previous behavior was simply broken: there was no way to
see all your functions (unless they happened to live in a single
schema, then you could do the non-intuituve and annoying \df schemaname.)
For the record, many of the people *I* know, including many 'hackers',
like this change a lot.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200901151139
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAklvaAkACgkQvJuQZxSWSshpJQCbB5LbrjuP1Q9CcYAkdh6xLnoC
kSsAoLvXVnGqJLi1RfnmIgzn/VRVjF9B
=Twyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-15 16:46:49 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-15 16:45:09 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch