Re: Shouldn't postgres_fdw report warning when it gives up getting result from foreign server?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't postgres_fdw report warning when it gives up getting result from foreign server?
Date: 2021-11-19 15:44:18
Message-ID: f3a46c40-2ffd-4f5e-b145-ac568019a6db@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/11/19 22:13, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> How about adding the warning message in pgfdw_abort_cleanup instead of
> pgfdw_get_cleanup_result?
>
> Just before this in pgfdw_abort_cleanup seems better to me.

I was thinking pgfdw_get_cleanup_result() is better because it can
easily report different warning messages based on cases of a timeout
or connection failure, respectively. Since pgfdw_get_cleanup_result()
returns true in both those cases, ISTM that it's not easy to
distinguish them in pgfdw_abort_cleanup().

Anyway, attached is the patch (pgfdw_get_cleanup_result_v1.patch)
that makes pgfdw_get_cleanup_result() report a warning message.

> Yeah, this seems to be an opportunity. But, the function should deal
> with the timeout separately, I'm concerned that the function will
> eventually be having if (timeout_param_specified) { } else { } sort
> of code. We can see how much duplicate code we save here vs the
> readability or complexity that comes with the single function.

Please see the attached patch (refactor_pgfdw_get_result_v1.patch).
This is still WIP, but you can check how much the refactoring can
simplify the code.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgfdw_get_cleanup_result_v1.patch text/plain 2.4 KB
refactor_pgfdw_get_result_v1.patch text/plain 5.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2021-11-19 15:47:06 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-11-19 15:25:49 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners