Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
Date: 2016-11-05 00:19:09
Message-ID: f2f648f3-9e5f-122f-62b7-a4b2447ef8bb@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/4/16 4:55 AM, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> 1. Does everyone agrees that renaming the existing datatype without
> changing the OID?
>
>
> As I said before, Npgsql for one loads data types by name, not by OID.
> So this would definitely cause breakage.

Why would that cause breakage?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-05 04:28:54 Re: WAL consistency check facility
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-05 00:17:29 Re: add more NLS to bin