|From:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: insensitive collations|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On 16/01/2019 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 14:20, Daniel Verite wrote:
>> I've found another issue with aggregates over distinct:
>> the deduplication seems to ignore the collation.
> I have a fix for that. I'll send it with the next update.
Another patch. This fixes your issue, and it incorporates the findings
from the thread "ExecBuildGroupingEqual versus collations", as well as a
few other fixes and more tests.
As far as I can tell, this covers everything now, meaning all the
relevant plan types propagate the collation correctly and all the
relevant operators and functions do the right things with them.
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
|Next Message||Alvaro Herrera||2019-01-25 15:30:39||Re: Simplify set of flags used by MyXactFlags|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2019-01-25 15:19:21||Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds|