Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1

From: "Ben Trewern" <ben(dot)trewern(at)mowlem(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1
Date: 2007-03-19 12:09:48
Message-ID: etluid$14p5$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

So what's he meant to do? Write a longer question just so the mandatory
disclamer that his company attaches to his e-mail takes up a lower
percentage of his e-mail? (or should he not ask the question at all?)

Regards,

Ben

>
> Btw, I personally find a payload/noise ratio of 1/6 atrocious,
> and not very kind regarding the mailing-list.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alain Roger 2007-03-19 12:54:14 Stored Procedure / function and their result
Previous Message Shoaib Mir 2007-03-19 12:06:37 Re: Client/Server [max connections]