Re: [HACKERS] Re: tab completion in psql

From: Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu>
To: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: tab completion in psql
Date: 1999-11-30 18:49:24
Message-ID: emacs-smtp-20280-14404-7220-662833@export.andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Then Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> spoke up and said:
> The tab completion is not very smart, it only covers the really obvious
> cases. Doing FROM shouldn't be so hard, but once you get into WHERE you
> almost end up writing a complete SQL parser just for this. Not that
> there's anything fundamentally wrong with that. It's a very evolving piece
> of code, however; it can only get better. I bet those readline authors
> never had this one in mind. Otherwise readline would play nicer with it.

I've used Python's readline support, and I must say it's really nice
when the readline engine can complete more dynamic names. It would be
very nice if "\d table" or "\dt" populated a dictionary of some kind
which could then be used for completion. While context sensitivity
would be even better, it might be worthwhile to simply have a dynamic
dictionary.

--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-11-30 19:36:01 Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability)
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-11-30 17:55:21 Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability)