Hi,
On 2026-05-05 13:23:12 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Agreed. I did this to match up with the ICU API a bit better, but if
> it's interfering with useful tools, then the special cases aren't worth
> it.
> Patch attached.
Thanks!
> It causes a bit of churn, so one disadvantage is that it will complicate
> future backports in this area.
I think it's worth the gain in instrument-ability. I also suspect it's good
for runtime performance, adding all those branches can't be particularly good.
Greetings,
Andres Freund