Re: expressive test macros (was: Report test_atomic_ops() failures consistently, via macros)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: expressive test macros (was: Report test_atomic_ops() failures consistently, via macros)
Date: 2019-10-07 19:58:08
Message-ID: eff1a2a2-f2ad-90c1-95eb-62631babacf8@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-07 19:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd just put them all in c.h. I see no reason why a new header
> is helpful.

Assert stuff is already in there, but surely stuff that calls elog()
doesn't belong in there?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-10-07 20:06:41 Re: expressive test macros (was: Report test_atomic_ops() failures consistently, via macros)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-10-07 19:56:20 Re: expressive test macros (was: Report test_atomic_ops() failures consistently, via macros)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-10-07 19:58:57 Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and encrypted files
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-10-07 19:56:20 Re: expressive test macros (was: Report test_atomic_ops() failures consistently, via macros)