Re: index-only scans

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: index-only scans
Date: 2011-08-11 20:57:39
Message-ID: efc55fe88ef91833d409fff0b8170fa9@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> 1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
> perhaps susceptible to improvement. I thought about building a
> virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
> one? Or maybe this should be done some other way altogether.

Maybe it's time to finally remove the been-deprecated-for-a-while OIDs?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201108111654
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk5EQiEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsglcQCeKsLRvd958M5QJ8YC8aNqr/Ku
11QAn1Iwaz9GuGVOB28orAITCsSX4MOo
=JMag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-08-11 21:01:53 Re: index-only scans
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-08-11 20:49:28 Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT