Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date: 2018-01-17 17:50:35
Message-ID: ef333e92-51a9-bccc-ccc9-a9dba8782152@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/17/18 12:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't know too much about the internals here, so looking at your
> list, I wonder whether "ssl_dh_params_file" ought to be treated as
> implementation-specific too. The other four files seem essential
> to any feature-complete implementation, but is that one?

The proposed GnuTLS patch does make use of ssl_dh_params_file.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emre Hasegeli 2018-01-17 17:59:30 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-17 17:49:32 Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()