Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Date: 2021-07-28 16:39:42
Message-ID: eec5e0ea-22fd-985c-855e-bb857e3f7abd@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/28 12:44, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/07/28 6:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 27/07/2021 19:49, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> Anyway I attached the patch that changes only xact_redo_abort()
>>> so that it calls XLogFlush() to update min recovery point.
>>
>> Looks good to me, thanks! FWIW, I used the attached script to reproduce this.
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Barring any objection, I will commit the patch and
> back-patch it to all supported versions.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-07-28 16:49:24 Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-07-28 16:32:03 Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?