Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2018-02-01 22:51:55
Message-ID: ee4278d9-e421-145c-51d8-790a43ebff3d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/01/2018 03:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> To close out this commit fest, I'm setting both of these patches as
> returned with feedback, as there are apparently significant issues to be
> addressed. Feel free to move them to the next commit fest when you
> think they are ready to be continued.
>

Will do. Thanks for the feedback.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-02-02 00:21:49 Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention during ReserveXLogInsertLocation()
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-02-01 22:50:25 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions