Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dmitri Maziuk <dmaziuk(at)bmrb(dot)wisc(dot)edu>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-09-17 15:27:48
Message-ID: edd9e90e-da16-2e13-158e-0cee59795d21@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 09/17/2018 08:11 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 12:52:34 +0000
> Martin Mueller <martinmueller(at)northwestern(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>> ... The overreach is dubious on both practical and theoretical grounds. "Stick to your knitting " or the KISS principle seem good advice in this context.
> Moderated mailing lists ain't been broken all these years, therefore they need fixing. Obviously.

Folks,

At this point it is important to accept that the CoC is happening. We
aren't going to stop that. The goal now is to insure a CoC that is
equitable for all community members and that has appropriate
accountability. At hand it appears that major concern is the CoC trying
to be authoritative outside of community channels. As well as wording
that is a bit far reaching. Specifically I think people's main concern
is these two sentences:

"To that end, we have established this Code of Conduct for community
interaction and participation in the project’s work and the community at
large. This Code is meant to cover all interaction between community
members, whether or not it takes place within postgresql.org
infrastructure, so long as there is not another Code of Conduct that
takes precedence (such as a conference's Code of Conduct)."

If we can constructively provide feedback about those two sentences,
great (or constructive feedback on other areas of the CoC). If we can't
then this thread needs to stop. It has become unproductive.

My feedback is that those two sentences provide an overarching authority
that .Org does not have the right to enforce and that it is also largely
redundant because we allow that the idea that if another CoC exists,
then ours doesn't apply. Well every single major collaboration channel
we would be concerned with (including something like Blogger) has its
own CoC within its Terms of use. That effectively neuters the PostgreSQL
CoC within places like Slack, Facebook, Twitter etc...

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-09-17 15:39:20 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Dmitri Maziuk 2018-09-17 15:11:36 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2018-09-17 15:35:55 Re: Pgbouncer and postgres
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-09-17 15:21:41 Re: Logical locking beyond pg_advisory

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amul sul 2018-09-17 15:36:01 Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-09-17 15:13:28 Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-09-17 15:39:20 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Dmitri Maziuk 2018-09-17 15:11:36 Re: Code of Conduct plan