On 17-08-2018 14:04, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> ...
>> Or perhaps we can use a more detailed failure status so for each type
>> of failure we always know the command name (argument "cmd") and
>> whether the client is aborted. Something like this (but in comparison
>> with the first variant ISTM overly complicated):
>
> I agree., I do not think that it would be useful given that the same
> thing is done on all meta-command error cases in the end.
Ok!
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company