Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish
Date: 2020-03-24 02:13:44
Message-ID: ed837332-4754-aeae-05ab-79ad774b0b6e@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/23 15:56, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/03/19 19:39, Atsushi Torikoshi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:19 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com <mailto:masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I have no idea about this. But I wonder how much that change
>>     is helpful to reduce the power consumption because waiting
>>     for WAL archive during the backup basically not so frequently
>>     happens.
>>
>>
>> +1.
>> And as far as I reviewed the patch,  I didn't find any problems.
>
> Thanks for the review!
> Barring any objection, I will commit this patch.

Pushed! Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-24 02:41:34 Re: Define variables in the approprieate scope
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-24 01:52:50 Re: Make mesage at end-of-recovery less scary.