Re: pg_receivewal documentation

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Date: 2019-07-19 17:02:21
Message-ID: ed80ae5f-dc1d-916a-61a2-33bb20821942@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 7/18/19 9:27 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The location of the warning is
> also harder to catch for the reader, so instead let's move it to the
> top where we have an extra description for --synchronous. I am
> finishing with the attached that I would be fine to commit and
> back-patch as needed. Does that sound fine?

LGTM.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-07-19 17:12:57 Re: [RFC] Removing "magic" oids
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2019-07-19 17:01:27 Re: pg_receivewal documentation