Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c
Date: 2020-08-21 03:39:37
Message-ID: ec39f0dd-eaa8-d41d-182b-765037637568@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/08/21 12:29, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:18, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020/08/21 10:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've attached the patch for $subject.
>>>
>>> s/replications lots/replication slots/
>>
>> Thanks for the patch!
>>
>> Also it's better to s/replications slots/replication slots/ ?
>>
>> --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
>> +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ typedef struct ComputeXidHorizonsResult
>> * be removed.
>> *
>> * This likely should only be needed to determine whether pg_subtrans can
>> - * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replications slots,
>> + * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replication slots,
>> * for historical reasons. But that could likely be changed.
>> */
>> TransactionId oldest_considered_running;
>>
>
> Indeed. I agree with you.

Thanks! So I pushed both fixes.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-08-21 03:44:25 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-08-21 03:29:22 Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c