Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: mathias(at)brossard(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Date: 2018-10-31 06:34:02
Message-ID: ec1c0e3e-179c-d2db-aef6-aa9996b63522@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/10/31 15:30, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> st 31. 10. 2018 v 3:27 odesílatel Amit Langote <
> Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> napsal:
>> + appendPQExpBufferStr(&buf, "\nWHERE c.relkind IN ('p')\n");
>>
>> I wonder if we should list partitioned indexes ('I') as well, because
>> their size information is not available with \di+. But maybe, they should
>> have a separate command.
>>
>
> I though about it too and I prefer separate command. Similar to \di+

Okay, maybe \dI+.

> I am not sure. Has not sense run this test over empty database, and some
> bigger database can increase running.
>
> More the size can be platform depend.

Okay, sure.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-10-31 06:36:06 Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-10-31 06:30:45 Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table