| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
| Date: | 2023-06-06 19:15:39 |
| Message-ID: | ebda05062491d00f84d87f6edd7d90022ebf1c37.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 14:11 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> This discussion makes me wonder (though probably too late for the v16
> cycle) if we shouldn't treat "C" and "POSIX" locales to be a third
> provider, something like "internal".
That's exactly what I did in v6 of this series: I created a "none"
provider, and when someone specified provider=icu iculocale=C, it would
change the provider to "none":
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5f9bf4a0b040428c5db2dc1f23cc3ad96acb5672.camel%40j-davis.com
I'm fine with either approach.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2023-06-06 19:18:02 | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
| Previous Message | Cary Huang | 2023-06-06 19:03:31 | Re: Mark a transaction uncommittable |