Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation

From: Jürgen Strobel <juergen+postgresql(at)strobel(dot)info>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Date: 2018-11-12 23:06:45
Message-ID: ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2018-11-12 17:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> One of the guiding principles that I think we should hold for
>> partitioning is that operating directly into the partition should be
>> seen as only an optimization compared to inserting into the parent table
>> -- thus it should not behave differently. Applying different default
>> values depending on where you're inserting into goes counter to that
>> principle.
>
> I'm not entirely convinced that I buy that argument, especially not in
> a case like this where it introduces logical inconsistencies where there
> otherwise wouldn't be any.
>

I think I missed something, what are the *introduced* logical problems?
Apart from implementation issues the only logical problems I see are if
you allow to change defaults of the partition key columns, and these are
problematic (nonsensical really) in either case.

Regards,
Jürgen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-12 23:57:19 Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Previous Message Romero, Yonatan 2018-11-12 21:10:54 Re: BUG #15499: pg_dump does not read connection URL from environment variable

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-12 23:07:20 Re: [Bug Fix]ECPG: cancellation of significant digits on ECPG
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-11-12 23:04:59 Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128