Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date: 2023-11-21 11:25:06
Message-ID: eb8edbf8-30ad-4cdb-81f7-4b3cc6f39f7c@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/20/23 23:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 03:31:20PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>
>> I still wonder if we need "base backup" in the messages? That sort of
>> implies (at least to me) you used pg_basebackup but that may not be the
>> case.
>
> Or just s/base backup/backup/?

That's what I meant but did not explain very well.

Regards,
-David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alena Rybakina 2023-11-21 11:31:11 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-11-21 11:05:31 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby