Re: plTcl - how to create proc/function libraries

From: "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plTcl - how to create proc/function libraries
Date: 2006-08-02 14:24:53
Message-ID: eaqcjf$1a9a$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

True, I cannot find this in the current docs - that statement about the
conditional compile was from some documentation I found from googling
"pltcl_modules pltcl_modfuncs"

I went back to the site i found it and snooped around and saw that it was a
copy of docs from 1998.

Sorry about the confusion, but I don't know whether the pltcl.dll (in other
words, the Windows postgres installation) supports the "unknown" command,
and pulling up this doc (in error, once again - sorry) came out of
desperation for looking for more information on the creating and maintenace
of those tables (pltcl_modules pltcl_modfuncs), and why I don't have the
support scrtipts for them in my Windows installation.

Carlo

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:9063(dot)1154493062(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
> "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> writes:
>> To enable this behavior, the PL/Tcl call handler must be compiled
>> with -DPLTCL_UNKNOWN_SUPPORT set.
>
> Where are you reading that? There's no such sentence in the current
> docs, and no sign of any such conditional in the source code either.
> I'm not sure why it doesn't work for you, but it's not because it's
> been deliberately turned off...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-08-02 14:28:18 Re: LISTEN considered dangerous
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-02 13:49:40 Re: ECPG and COPY