From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Date: | 2012-06-19 08:44:33 |
Message-ID: | ea6bcf99f1f67bfe3a1cf20e6004c1b0@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:44:24 +0800, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>>> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Magnus Hagander
>>> > <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> >> Uh, that part is just incorrect. Several sets of platform packages
>>> >> certainly do initdb for you. And AFAIK every single one of them on
>>> >> Linux at least do service setup for you.
>>>
>>> > Hmm, clearly it's been a while since I did a PG installation on
Debian
>>> > (oddly!), as that does seem to leave the server up and running. I'm
>>> > fairly certain it didn't in the past.
>>> > RPMs on the other hand, do not.
>>>
>>> FWIW, Red-Hat-based systems have a strong distro policy against
starting
>>> servers merely because the package got installed --- the theory is
that
>>> an "everything" install should not leave the user running a bunch of
>>> servers he doesn't know about and maybe hasn't configured securely.
>>>
>>> I'm a bit surprised to hear that Debian does it differently; although
>>> it's possible that they distinguish manual from automatic install
>>> scenarios. It's a little bit saner to do an auto service start if you
>>> know that the user explicitly requested this specific package.
>>>
>>
>> When you use aptitude or apt-get to install the server package, it will
>> install the binaires, execute initdb, and start the server. I much
>> prefer the RPM way of doing it (IOW, not starting the server). Anyway,
I
>> guess there are both pros and cons in both methods.
>
> Yeah. But it's a good point that since they are different, I should
> add info to each of the pages saying exactly how it behaves on that
> specific platform.
I'm not sure this is really our responsibility. The package maintainer
should have a webpage explaining how his packages work.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-06-19 08:51:28 | Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Previous Message | Pierre-Emmanuel André | 2012-06-19 08:22:16 | Re: Some restructuring of the download section |