Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date: 2017-11-14 13:57:58
Message-ID: e99984b3-b3ec-ca70-b6c4-165358e4c775@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/8/17 12:15, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 11/8/17 11:11, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I have already submitted a separate patch that addresses these questions.
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm obtuse, but I'm not seeing it? In very interested in the
>>> general approach to transaction management; if you've described it in
>>> the patch I'll read it there. Thanks for doing this.
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/178d3380-0fae-2982-00d6-c43100bc8748@2ndquadrant.com
>
> All right, thanks. So,

Could we have this discussion in that other thread? This thread is just
about procedures at mostly a syntax level.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2017-11-14 14:27:11 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures
Previous Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2017-11-14 13:23:56 Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods