From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | S Bob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: wide table, many many partitions, poor query performance |
Date: | 2021-03-15 17:03:59 |
Message-ID: | e948e9adef1e8f30d32571dd32b2ee422a7055f5.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 10:53 -0600, S Bob wrote:
> We have a client that is running PostgreSQL 12, they have a table with
> 212 columns and 723 partitions
>
> It seems the planning time is consumed by generating 723 sub plans
>
> I suspect it's due to the fact that they are using hash based
> partitioning, example:
>
> CREATE TABLE rental_transaction_hash_p723 PARTITION OF
> rental_transaction FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS 723, REMAINDER 723);
>
> Based on a strategy like this, queries will ALWAYS scan all partitions
> unless a hash value is specified as part of the query, correct? I
> suspect this is the issue... looking for confirmation, or feedback if
> i'm off base
That is correct.
The only use I can see in hash partitioning is to put the partitions
on different storage devices in order to spread I/O - kind of striping
on the database level.
Unless you can benefit from that, your queries will become slower.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2021-03-17 12:05:11 | Re: proposal: schema variables - doc |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-03-15 17:03:35 | Re: wide table, many many partitions, poor query performance |