Stefan Keller wrote:
> Pls. try to give DUAL a better name, since it's IMHO neither
> self-explaining nor correct.
I agree with the sentiment.
On the other hand, people who migrate from Oracle might be happy if
there is a DUAL table that allows them to migrate some of their
statements unmodified.
I don't know if that is a good enough argument, though.
Currently there is "orafce" which provides DUAL, and it might be
good enough if it defines DUAL as a view on DUMMY.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe