| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tid_blockno() and tid_offset() accessor functions |
| Date: | 2026-04-05 19:30:09 |
| Message-ID: | e7i24ywpdlac6cutvcfq5wg2jgwkmy3i42hxr2djbms4c64bps@el7zd7fgzqrh |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2026-03-14 14:31:32 +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> Attaching a patch with all document changes, removed the cross-reference to
> datatype-oid entirely. I've moved the &func-tid; entry in func.sgml to
> directly follow &func-textsearch;, which fits better alphabetically, and
> reworded the introductory paragraph to be much more concise, directly
> pointing to the table.
Pushed this after making some small changes (removed some IMO unnecessary
comments, replaced <type>TID</type> with <acronym/>, as TID is not the type's
name, ...).
I was reminded of this thread while in the process of doing some performance
validation that required getting all the block numbers from an index scan,
which required me to remember (ctid::text::point)[0], which I find to be very
ugly.
Closed the CF entry.
Thanks for the patch!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-04-05 19:35:58 | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures |
| Previous Message | warda Bibi | 2026-04-05 19:27:33 | Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend |