Re: PostgreSQL OR performance

From: "David Wilson" <david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
Date: 2008-11-07 10:07:32
Message-ID: e7f9235d0811070207ka8baab0w5ffe6cfbb947b56b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> "Merge Join (cost=518771.07..62884559.80 rows=1386158171 width=32) (actual
> time=30292.802..755751.242 rows=34749 loops=1)"

Have you tried increasing the default_statistics_target? The planner
is expecting 1.3 billion rows to be produced from a query that's only
actually producting 35k, which probably indicates some very bad
statistics. At the same time, the materialize step produces 242
million rows when the planner only expects to produce 2.3, indicating
a similar problem in the opposite direction. This probably means that
the planner is choosing plans that would be optimal if it was making
good guesses but are decidedly sub-optimal for your actual data.

--
- David T. Wilson
david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2008-11-07 10:45:50 Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
Previous Message Віталій Тимчишин 2008-11-07 09:14:01 Re: PostgreSQL OR performance