Re: Testing Sandforce SSD

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Date: 2010-07-28 12:24:00
Message-ID: e7e05556-9a42-11df-9b6a-001cc0cda50c@msgid.mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:23:20PM -0600, Greg Spiegelberg wrote:
>I know I'm talking development now but is there a case for a pg_xlog block
>device to remove the file system overhead and guaranteeing your data is
>written sequentially every time?

If you dedicate a partition to xlog, you already get that in practice
with no extra devlopment.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-07-28 13:45:23 Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Previous Message Michael Stone 2010-07-28 12:21:52 Re: Testing Sandforce SSD