From: | Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Date: | 2016-12-13 17:22:12 |
Message-ID: | e740225e-3073-3cb8-4a60-261c2ddca8a6@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers,
On 08.12.2016 19:44, Dmitry Ivanov wrote:
>> That would be fantastic. I and my colleagues at EnterpriseDB can
>> surely help review; of course, maybe you and some of your colleagues
>> would like to help review our patches, too.
>
> Certainly, I'll start reviewing as soon as I get familiar with the code.
>
>
>> Do you think this is
>> likely to be something where you can get something done quickly, with
>> the hope of getting it into v10?
>
> Yes, I've just cleared my schedule in order to make this possible. I'll
> bring in the patches ASAP.
>
>
We've noticed that PartitionDispatch object is built on every INSERT
query and that it could create unnecessary overhead. Wouldn't it be
better to keep it in relcache?
Thanks!
--
Ildar Musin
i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Rusinov | 2016-12-13 17:47:55 | [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Previous Message | Nico Williams | 2016-12-13 17:13:50 | Re: jsonb problematic operators |